End of Syrian Conflict Depends on US-Iran Nuclear Negotiations

For the last three years, I’ve said, in private discussions, that the Syrian conflict won’t be solved until the US and Iran come to some sort of agreement on Iran’s nuclear program. It looks like one is just over the horizon–but also far enough away that it still may not happen.

There are, however, bogey’s on both sides. Conservatives in Iran are upset at what they see as concessions and Republicans–and Democrats for that matter–in Congress are attempting to impose a new round sanctions. Both groups could, through their meddling and activism, sabotage the process.

What ever their respective end games may be, they’re dancing dangerously close to leading both countries into a military confrontation. This will only further destabilize the region and should be avoided.

Far worse, however, is the likelihood that continued stalemate between Iran and the US will lead to a deepening of the conflict in Syria. Congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle have called for a solution to what can only be described as a civil war cum transnational conflict being waged by regional powers and non-state violent actors (NVSAs). But without a settlement to the nuclear negotiations, the Syrian Civil War is likely to continue to spiral out of control. It is not known, however, if Congressional leaders realize the connection–something tells me they don’t.

Having said that, this past October, in a meeting with an aide from Senator Rand Paul’s office, I was told that the junior Senator from Kentucky believes that the road to a solution in Syria runs through Tehran. That seemed to be an astute assessment of the situation, until Sen. Paul followed up that proclamation with piece in Foreign Policy that sounded a bit more hawkish regarding Iran.

Regardless, the crises–both in Syria and the negotiations between US and Iran–aren’t going away anytime soon. The question is can they be managed so as to avoid an out of control region wide war? Or have we already reached that point? Outside of that, will conservatives and hardliners on both sides (Iran and the US) allow negotiators the bandwidth to get a deal signed? Once that takes place, can the regional powers backing the various groups taking part in the Syrian Civil War come together and end the hostilities?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Bringing language research into the classroom

All Things Revolutionary

An objective view of what Iran's revolution means in the 21st c/e

Foreign Policy

the Global Magazine of News and Ideas


Critical Perspectives on U.S. Foreign Policy


Syria and Turkey commentary

Media Diversified

Tackling the lack of diversity in UK media and the ubiquity of whiteness

Sorry Television

Reading a book a week


"Books are humanity in print." Barbara Tuchman

Sentence first

An Irishman's blog about the English language.

QWF Writes

Quebec Writers' Federation. Two cents, once a month.

Bespoke Traveler

Curated Tales for the Curious Traveler

The Daily Think

a daily visual diary by Laura Quick (all Images Ā© Laura Quick)


Startup and Technology News

The Disorder Of Things

For the Relentless Criticism of All Existing Conditions Since 2010


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: